Wow. The two big items political items today are, of course John Kerry's dominance in the primaries, and Bush's hour with Tim Russert on Meet The Press.

Kerry is staying on message, with a more focused Iraq narrative using some of Bush's own words of only ours earlier.

Bush is seemingly lacking in defenders. I even went to the RNC to see if there was any kind of back-slapping going on. Nope. It's all about Kerry. You may want to click over and vote in the RNC's little poll. I did. It was fun.

Of course the foreign press is particularly harsh.

Wiliam Saletan of Slate, a pundit which you never know what he'll say next, is questioning Bush's grasp on reality. Shrill.

Tomorrow should bring out the usual suspects to set us straight on Bush's performance.

This one sidedness is weird. I'm sure that pro-Bush bloggers are making entries defending their guy, but when stalwarts such as Fox News are merely regurgitating pieces of the transcript, you have to wonder. By the way, Kerry is the big news over at Faux.

I really want give equal time here. But I can't find a positive missive about Bush's performance. No, I'm not going to TownHall. :)

Here's Kerry's latest:

..In a written statement, Kerry called on Bush to testify before the intelligence commission he has appointed to investigate the prewar intelligence.

"This morning on 'Meet the Press,' President Bush said that his decision to go to war with Iraq when he did was because Saddam Hussein had, quote, 'the ability to make weapons,' " Kerry told reporters at the news conference.

"This is a far cry from what the president and his administration told the American people throughout 2002. Back then, President Bush repeatedly told the American people that Saddam Hussein, quote, 'has got chemical weapons.'

"They told us they could deploy those weapons within 45 minutes to do injury to our troops," Kerry said. "They told us they had aerial vehicles and the capacity to deliver those weapons through the air. And it was on that basis that he sent America's sons and daughters marching off to war."

Bush said on "Meet the Press" that he had "expected to find the weapons," but that his decision to go to war was really "based upon that intelligence in the context of the war against terror."

But Kerry said that the U.S. intelligence community apparently had its own questions about whether Iraq had such weapons.

"The problem is not just that he is changing his story now -- it is that it appears he was telling the American people stories in 2002," Kerry said. "He told America that Iraq had chemical weapons two months after his own Defense Intelligence Agency told him that there was, quote, 'no reliable information on whether Iraq is producing and stockpiling chemical weapons.' "

Asked about his support for a Senate resolution making war an option, Kerry responded, "We voted for a process" with assurance from the Bush administration that weapons of mass destruction were "the only rationale for going to war."

Kerry said he and other lawmakers pushed the administration to build a "legitimate global coalition" and "honor" the process of U.N. weapons inspections by giving it time to find answers.

"I noticed today the president said he made the decision to go to the U.N. Let's not revise history completely. We forced the president to go to the U.N. We pushed the president to go to the U.N," he said.

Kerry accused the administration of picking and choosing intelligence that promoted its position while leaving out "clear evidence to the contrary."

Bush, however, said in his "Meet the Press" interview that "Congress saw the same intelligence I had, and they looked at exactly what I looked at, and they made an informed judgment based upon the information that I had."

Kerry said he questions whether the United Nations would now trust U.S. intelligence on any other country. There is an "urgency" to get answers, he said.

He reiterated his call for Bush to have "a legitimate and immediate investigation into the extraordinary failure of intelligence or to help explain to the American people whether there were politics in the development of that intelligence."

"It ought to be done in a matter of months," Kerry said.

"I ask the president to take responsibility and set the record straight and immediately convene people who can give those answers to the American people," he said.

In a written statement, Kerry called on Bush "in light of his new information today" to "immediately agree to testify before his intelligence commission."

Bush said on NBC that he'd be glad to visit the commission but would not testify.

CNN has the whole story

With Bush and Kerry the only games in town, I'll post ten links that have nothing to do -- except perhaps funding -- with American politics.