Intelligent Design Case Now In Judge's Hands

I have really struggled to steer clear of anything religious. I have no religous - or any other supernatural beliefs.

But when religion and science clash on something as profound as evolutionary theory, a stand must be taken.

The NYT has this little that article anyone with scientific training can dissect(no pun intended) in an instant.

Here's the bit:

The scientists who advocate intelligent design explained that the complexity of biological organisms and the "purposeful arrangement of parts" are evidence that there is a designer. They said their theory is not religious because they are not claiming the designer is God, since that is untestable.

Well, I spent 8 years at university learning - in part anyway - what a 'scientific theory' is...and it is above all, testable.

End.
Of.
Argument.